Ukraine’s Donetsk Region invites Kiev to sign provisional constitutional treaty
Right Sector still active despite Geneva deals — Sergei Lavrov
Feasibility study for construction of Kerch bridge due by October 1
No logic in West’s readiness to recognize elections in Ukraine but not in Syria — Lavrov
US not ready to admit it can’t run the show around globe — Sergei Lavrov
No logic in West’s readiness to recognize elections in Ukraine but not in Syria — LavrovWorld April 23, 22:04
Lavrov: Russian troops stay on own territory, take no steps against obligationsRussia April 23, 21:46
Army to get new missile for upgraded Pantsir-S system by end of 2014Russia April 23, 21:34
Right Sector still active despite Geneva deals — Sergei LavrovRussia April 23, 21:29
Feasibility study for construction of Kerch bridge due by October 1Russia April 23, 21:20
Turkish PM offers condolences to descendants of Armenians who perished in 1915World April 23, 21:04
Most murders on Maidan will be hard to resolve, says Interior Ministry spokespersonWorld April 23, 20:55
US not ready to admit it can’t run the show around globe — Sergei LavrovRussia April 23, 20:37
Ukraine’s Donetsk Region invites Kiev to sign provisional constitutional treatyWorld April 23, 20:15
April 23, 23:32
MOSCOW, July 6 (Itar-Tass) —— The adoption of a biased resolution on Syria by the UN Human Rights Council will be unable to promote the beginning of a political process in that country, the Russian Foreign Ministry said on Friday. The resolution had been proposed by the United States.
“Russia was opposed to such a draft from the outset,” the Foreign Ministry said. “In the wake of the June 30 international conference in Geneva, which formulated a consolidated position of the international community on the settlement in Syria, it was important to preserve the constructive atmosphere and to create conditions for systematic work with the Syrian parties with the aim of putting an end to violence and establishing a political dialogue.”
However, the co-authors “chose a different way and proposed a document that departs far from the position agreed at the ministerial meeting on June 30,” the Foreign Ministry said. “In the text there is no condemnation of violence by the armed Opposition, about which the head of the UN observer mission in Syria Robert Mood had reported more than once. There is no condemnation of the acts of terrorism, although dozens of people have died at the terrorists’ hands. A blind eye is turned on this deliberately.
“In an attempt to balance the text the Russian delegation proposed an amendment with words of condemnation of the terrorist attacks in Syria,” the Foreign Ministry said. “We can find no explanation, let alone excuse for the authors’ refusal to accept that amendment, against which they voted. We regard this as departure from the liabilities under the UN Security Council’s resolutions on terrorism.
“In that connection the Russian delegation was forced to put the resolution to the vote in general and to vote against it alongside China and Cuba. India, the Philippines and Uganda abstained,” the Russian Foreign Ministry said.
“The imposition of that resolution on the international community has shown that in this way some states are trying to revise the provisions of the final communiqu· of the Geneva conference. Clearly, the adoption of this resolution will not promote the beginning of a political process in Syria.
Moscow proceeds from the understanding that for the genuine settlement of the crisis “there must be honest and systematic work with the Syrians, including the Opposition, for the sake of ending the violence.”
“Russia will continue to press for a peace settlement in Syria in cooperation with all parties concerned,” the Foreign Ministry said.